Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Hi, I’m Amit Dilip, and for the past 2.6 years, I’ve worked as an SEO Manager. You can find me on LinkedIn. In my daily work, my team and I use ChatGPT and other AI tools to support content ideation, on-page SEO, technical audits, and user experience testing. Over this time, I’ve gained hands-on insights into what works (and what doesn’t) when choosing an AI assistant. In this post, I’ll walk you through.
- How I compare Microsoft Copilot vs ChatGPT
- When one makes more sense than the other for SEO and content work
- practical tips you can apply in your workflows
- a balanced verdict (spoiler: “better” depends)
My goal is to give you experience-based views, actionable guidance, and a grounded comparison you can test for yourself.
Table of Contents
My Experience: Where Each Tool Shines and Stumbles
From using both tools in SEO, content creation, audit assistance, and team workflows, here’s what I’ve observed. These are practical, real-world tradeoffs, not theory.
| Scenario / Use Case | Copilot’s Strengths (in my experience) | ChatGPT’s Strengths (in my experience) | Tradeoffs / Weak Spots I’ve Seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| Embedded productivity | Copilot lets me ask for content edits, data summaries, email drafts directly inside Word/Excel/PowerPoint. It’s smooth and saves context-switching. | ChatGPT is external, so you often generate text and then import. But it’s flexible and doesn’t require a Microsoft license. | With Copilot, you sometimes hit limitations in prompts because it expects structured tasks; with ChatGPT, sometimes you need to prompt more precisely. |
| SEO content ideation / outlines | Copilot helps me refine outlines, headings, short summaries within a document context. | ChatGPT gives more creative “outside the box” ideas, multiple angles, richer brainstorming. | Copilot sometimes “stays too close” to the original text; ChatGPT can wander off-topic if prompt control is weak. |
| Data / Excel / formula use | Copilot can generate formulas, visualize trends, and link to Excel sheets inside Microsoft apps. | ChatGPT can suggest formulas or logic, but I often need to copy-paste and test manually. | Copilot may struggle when data structures are non-standard; ChatGPT may make formula errors unless you validate. |
| Citations, factual accuracy, live context | Copilot can sometimes fetch live web context (via Prometheus model + search) which helps with timely facts. | ChatGPT’s knowledge is good, but depending on the plan, it may be limited on real-time web access. | Neither is perfect; always validate critical facts / numbers. |
| Collaboration & team handoff | Because Copilot lives in Word/Teams/Office, version control and co-editing are more seamless. | With ChatGPT, team members may pull via exported copy, which can lead to misalignment or fragmentation. | In large teams, Copilot licensing or tooling limits may arise; with ChatGPT, coordination is necessary to prevent prompt fragmentation. |
From my perspective, in many SEO/content workflows, Copilot accelerates “in-document refining, editing, and minor transformations”, while ChatGPT remains a powerful engine for high-level ideation, exploration, and draft generation.
A few anecdotal reflections:
- I once asked Copilot to “improve this section to be more conversational and SEO-friendly.” It made decent edits, but ChatGPT gave me three alternate rewrites with different tones, letting me pick the best.
- In a team content review, having Copilot suggestions inside Word was faster for editors to accept / tweak than bouncing content between ChatGPT and Word.
- But when we needed fresh angle ideas for a new topic cluster, I defaulted to ChatGPT because its “wide angle” thinking was more creative.
Expert Tips: How to Use Copilot & ChatGPT in SEO Workflows
Here are tips drawn from experience and from credible sources to exploit the strengths of both tools smartly in SEO / content workflows.
1. Hybrid Workflow: Start in ChatGPT, Refine in Copilot
- Use ChatGPT for ideation, multiple outlines, fresh angles, topic clusters. Let it throw many options at you.
- Export or paste the selected draft into Word (or wherever you use Copilot). Then ask Copilot to refine tone, optimize headings, add internal links.
- This hybrid approach gives you creative breadth + tight polish.
2. Use Prompt Engineering that Acknowledges the Tool’s Context
- In Copilot, prompts like “In this document, show me 3 alternatives for this paragraph focusing on keyword X” tend to work better than overly broad requests.
- In ChatGPT, prompts that provide context (target audience, tone, word count, keyword cluster) yield stronger drafts.
- Always test your prompts, iterate, and capture best prompts in a “prompt library” for repeat use.
3. Always Fact-Check and Add Human Touch
- Neither tool is infallible. I always validate important statistics, dates, or claims.
- Add a personal or case-study anecdote. That signals to readers (and Google) that content is grounded in real experience.
- Use internal linking to your own domain (e.g. link to other relevant posts on your blog) — this helps with authority and signals depth.
4. Monitor Performance & Adjust
- After publishing content generated via AI, monitor metrics like dwell time, bounce rate, and conversions.
- Use A/B testing: for similar content, test one version refined via Copilot and another via ChatGPT-only to see what Google/users prefer in your niche.
- Keep learning from user feedback: if readers say phrasing is robotic, adjust prompts or humanize further.
5. Understand Licensing & Data Policies
- Copilot (within Microsoft 365) often provides better data privacy, compliance, and organizational control. Some enterprises prefer it because input data stays inside controlled environments.
- ChatGPT’s policies on data usage depend on subscription level (e.g. ChatGPT Enterprise) — check how your content or sensitive inputs are handled.
Authoritativeness & Trust: What the Industry Says
To reinforce authoritative grounding, here are a few references and observations from industry sources:
- Zapier weighs in that both Copilot and ChatGPT can generate text, images, code — but the key difference lies in workflow and integration.
- Red River notes Copilot is “free (or embedded)” and aims at tasks like email, reports, research, while ChatGPT is broader.
- DataCamp highlights that ChatGPT is more versatile across industries, whereas Copilot is optimized for productivity inside Microsoft 365.
- OneAdvanced emphasizes that Copilot’s advantage in data security and compliance is a distinguishing factor for organizations.
- Computerworld argues that despite Microsoft’s push, ChatGPT continues to dominate user adoption, pointing to recognition, user preference, and use cases.
These sources help back up the evaluation I present here, not just my own opinion, but what the broader tech / AI community is observing.
Conclusion: Is Copilot Better Than ChatGPT?
The short answer: “Better” depends on your context, workflow, and priorities. There is no one-size-fits-all winner. But here’s how I’d summarize:
- If your work is deeply tied to Microsoft Office / Excel / Word / PowerPoint / Outlook / Teams, then Copilot often offers a smoother, context-aware experience and may “feel better” for in-document tasks.
- If you need maximum flexibility, creative ideation, and independence from a specific ecosystem, then ChatGPT remains a stellar tool.
- For SEO / content teams, I often recommend a hybrid strategy: use ChatGPT for exploration and generation, then polish, refine, and apply context inside Copilot.
- Always layer human expertise, fact-checking, and user experience insight. No AI tool replaces domain knowledge and strategy.
So, is Copilot better than Chat GPT? In certain workflows, yes. But in many, ChatGPT is still irreplaceable. The real win is knowing when to leverage each.
